Body condition scoring of sheep
James Thompson and Howard H. Meyer
Throughout the production cycle, sheep producers must know whether or not their sheep are in condition (too thin,
too fat, or just right) for the stage of production: breeding, late pregnancy, and lactation.
Weight at a given stage of production is the best indicator, but as there is a wide variation in mature size between
individuals and breeds, it is extremely difficult to use weight to determine proper condition. Body condition scoring
describes the condition of a sheep, is convenient, and is much more accurate than a simple eye appraisal.
Figure 1. Feel for the spine in the center of the sheep’s back, behind its last rib and in front of its hip bone.
Credit : James M. Thompson.
Figure 1. Feel for the spine in the center of the sheep’s back, behind its last rib and in front of its hip bone.
Credit : James M. Thompson.
Figure 1. Feel for the spine in the center of the sheep’s back, behind its last rib and in front of its hip bone.
Credit : James M. Thompson.
A body condition score estimates condition of muscling and fat development. Scoring is based on feeling the level of
muscling and fat deposition over and around the vertebrae in the loin region (Figures 1–3). In addition to the central
spinal column, loin vertebrae have a vertical bone protrusion (spinous process) and a short horizontal protrusion on
each side (transverse process). Both of these protrusions are felt and used to assess an individual body condition
score.
The system used most widely in the United States is based on a scale of 1 to 5 (Figures 4–8).
Condition 1 (emaciated)
Spinous processes are sharp and prominent. Loin eye muscle is shallow with no fat cover. Transverse processes are sharp; one can pass fingers under ends. It is possible to feel between each process
Condition 2 (thin)
Spinous processes are sharp and prominent. Loin eye muscle has little fat cover but is full. Transverse processes are smooth and slightly rounded. It is possible to pass fingers under the ends of the transverse processes with a little pressure.
Condition 3 (average)
Spinous processes are smooth and rounded and one can feel individual processes only with pressure. Transverse processes are smooth and well covered, and firm pressure is needed to feel over the ends. Loin eye muscle is full with some fat cover.
Condition 4 (fat)
Spinous processes can be detected only with pressure as a hard line. Transverse processes cannot be felt. Loin eye muscle is full with a thick fat cover.
Condition 5 (obese)
Spinous processes cannot be detected. There is a depression between fat where spine would normally be felt. Transverse processes cannot be detected. Loin eye muscle is very full with a very thick fat cover
The system contains everything from emaciated sheep to those that are grossly obese due to overfeeding or being nonproductive. In most typical sheep flocks, over 90 percent of the sheep should have a body condition score of 2, 3, or 4. It is recommended that half scores be used between 2 and 4, giving the following scores: 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, and 5.
The intermediate half scores are helpful when an animal’s condition is not clear. Keep in mind that placing an exact score is not as important as being able to assign a relative score. A body condition score of 3 versus a 3.5 is not such a big deal, but the relative difference between a 2.5 and 4 certainly is of concern.
Other than practical experience, there is little available research comparing condition scores with performance. The
majority of the research reported has dealt with the relationship of body condition score at breeding to ovulation
rate and subsequent lambing percentage. Generally, the better the body condition score at mating, the higher the ovulation rate and therefore the higher the potential lambing percentage. However, ewes with a condition score 3 greater than 4 at breeding tend to have a higher incidence of barrenness.
Ewes with a condition score less than 3 at breeding will be more responsive to the effects of flushing than those with
condition scores at 3.0–3.5 at mating.
Two research trials conducted by Oregon State University found that ewe body condition score at lambing had an
effect on total pounds of lamb weaned per ewe. Ewes with a body condition score of 3 to 4 at lambing lost fewer
offspring and weaned more pounds of lamb than those with a condition score of 2.5 or less.
In one study, ewes with a body condition score of 4 at lambing had a total weight of lamb weaned per ewe that was
82% greater than ewes with a body condition score of 2.5. The total weight weaned was 113 pounds versus 62
pounds per ewe. The increase in total weaning weight was due to improved lamb survival and heavier weaning
weights.
In the other study, there was a 33% difference in total weight of lamb weaned (64 versus 85 pounds per ewe)
between ewes with pre-lambing body condition scores of 2.5 to 3.5. This increase in pounds of lamb weaned was
primarily due to improved lamb survival for offspring from the ewes with the higher body condition score.Some suggested (optimum) condition score values for the various stages of the production cycle are:
•Breeding, 3–4
•Early–mid-gestation, 2.5–4
•Lambing (singles), 3.0–3.5
•Lambing (twins), 3.5–4
The scores suggested above should allow for optimum productivity in highly prolific ewes. On average, a difference
of one unit of condition score is equivalent to about 13% of the live weight of a ewe at a moderate (3–3.5) body
condition score. Thus, a ewe with a maintenance weight of 150 pounds would need to gain approximately 20 pounds to go from a body condition score of 2.5 to 3.5.
Body condition scoring is a subjective way to evaluate the status of a sheep flock — a potential tool for producers to
increase production efficiency in their flocks.
Resources
Khan, K., H.H. Meyer and J.M. Thompson. 1992. Effect of pre-lambing supplementation and ewe body condition
score on lamb survival and total weight of lamb weaned. Proceedings Western Section American Society of Animal
Science 43:175.
Russel, A. 1991. Body condition scoring of sheep. In: E. Boden (Ed.) Sheep and Goat Practice. p 3. Bailliere Tindall,
Philadelphia.
4
About the authors
James Thompson (https://extension.oregonstate.edu/people/james-thompson)
Sheep Specialist (Retired)
Howard H. Meyer
Former Associate Professor of Animal Sciences
Oregon State University
© 1994 Oregon State University. Extension work is a cooperative program of Oregon State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and
Oregon counties. Oregon State University Extension Service offers educational programs, activities, and materials without discrimination on the
basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status,
familial/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, genetic information, veteran’s status, reprisal or
retaliation for prior civil rights activity. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Accessibility: This publication will be made available in an accessible alternative format upon request. Please contact
puborders@oregonstate.edu or 541-737-3311.